Aurora Gaeta
← Back to home
IARC@60 Conference · 19–21 May 2026, Lyon

Abstracts presented at IARC@60

Two posters presented at the IARC@60 international conference, organised by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Both works stem from collaborations within the Euromelanoma network and IEO research programmes.

ENS53

Poster · IARC@60

Effectiveness of Skin Cancer Prevention Interventions in Melanoma Survivors: a Systematic Review

A. Gaeta*, L. Pierini*, E. Di Maggio, C. Doccioli, R.I. Vogel, G. Tosti, M. Saponara, W. Russell-Edu, P. Queirolo, D. Massi, V. De Giorgi, I. Stanganelli, S. Caini**, S. Gandini** — IEO, University of Milano-Bicocca, ISPRO Florence, University of Minnesota, and collaborating centres.

Background

Melanoma survivors and their relatives are at increased risk of subsequent skin cancers. Despite evidence that simple behavioural changes can reduce risk, real-world uptake remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined RCTs evaluating prevention interventions in this high-risk population.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA 2020). PubMed and Embase searched up to October 2025. 3,761 records identified; 17 RCTs included. Random-effects models; Summary Odds Ratio (SOR) with 95% CI. Risk of bias assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.

Key findings
  • Interventions significantly improved skin self-examination (SOR 2.05), limiting time outdoors (SOR 1.65), and wearing head protection (SOR 1.89).
  • Effects on total cutaneous examination and shade-seeking were positive but not statistically significant.
  • Control-arm design strongly influences observed effect sizes and heterogeneity.
  • Device-based interventions alone showed no significant impact on any outcome.
Forest plots for sun protection outcomes in melanoma survivors
Forest plots for selected outcomes: sun protection composite score, wearing sunscreen, staying in shade, and skin examination by a partner. From: Effectiveness of Skin Cancer Prevention Interventions in Melanoma Survivors: a Systematic Review.
ENS54

Poster · IARC@60

Indoor Tanning: Prevalence, Trends and Determinants from the Euromelanoma Campaign

A. Gaeta, H. Njimi, J.L. Bulliard, O. Correia, A.F. Duarte, K. Peris, A.J. Stratigos, E. Nagore, M.I. Longo, M. Bylaite-Bucinskiene, R. Karls, H. Helppikangas, Euromelanoma Working Group, V. Del Marmol, S. Gandini, M. Suppa — IEO, University of Milano-Bicocca, and 18 European institutions.

Background

Indoor tanning devices emit UVA radiation classified as Group 1 carcinogen by the WHO. Regular use before age 35 increases melanoma risk by approximately 75%. Despite public-health efforts, European prevalence data remain fragmented. The Euromelanoma campaign (N = 391,489 participants, 30 countries, 2009–2018) provides a unique platform for behavioural surveillance.

Methods

Cross-sectional survey embedded in the annual Euromelanoma skin-cancer-awareness campaign. Multivariable logistic regression for determinants (adjusted OR with 95% CI); country included as random effect.

Key findings
  • Indoor tanning prevalence more than halved from 12.22% in 2009 to 5.89% in 2018.
  • Female sex was the strongest predictor of use (OR 2.99), followed by age 20–35 years (OR 2.50).
  • Higher prevalence in northern, high-latitude countries; each degree of latitude associated with OR 1.08.
  • Sunbed use is shaped more by behavioural and cultural factors than by environmental exposure alone.
Sunbed use over time by country, 2009–2018
Sunbed use over time by country (2009–2018). From: Indoor Tanning: Prevalence, Trends and Determinants from the Euromelanoma Campaign.